 |
We shouldn’t allow overreactions to misperceived weaknesses in EHR security to thwart progress. It’s too important for the healthcare system and, ultimately, the American economy. It becomes a matter of what’s more dangerous: the potential misuse of information or simply not using information at all? Is the privacy of an overwhelming minority of people more important than safer, more efficient, more affordable and potentially life-saving healthcare for the overwhelming majority? Frankly, only the highest profile members of society (celebrities, athletes, etc.) stand to actually be negatively impacted by an unlikely EHR privacy breach. With that in mind, the question of whether we value the privacy of information more than its potential to help us lead healthier lives takes on a much more compelling perspective.
Without question, we must make ensuring privacy a top priority in any plans to implement EHRs. I’m confident that we as an industry can do so and, in fact, I think the OCR’s stronger controls are on the right track. No EHR is going to come with guaranteed safety, but I would argue that the risk level is the same or less than that associated with online retail and banking transactions. The public needs to understand this. It is up to those of us in the industry to ensure that the facts are clear and readily available. Hopefully, the media will choose to report all—not some—of them so that Americans can form opinions based on complete information.
Eric Demers is senior vice president of health and life science at MEDecision, a leading provider of collaborative healthcare management solutions. Learn more about MEDecision at www.MEDecision.com. Follow the company on Twitter at @MEDecision and on Facebook at www.MEDecision.com/Facebook.
Subscribe to our FREE Ezine and receive current Health News, be eligible for discounted products/services and coupons related to your Health. We publish 24/7.
HealthNewsDigest.com
For advertising/promotion, email: [email protected] Or call toll free: 877- 634-9180
