Advanced Search
Current and Breaking News for Professionals, Consumers and Media



Click here to learn how to advertise on this site and for ad rates.

Women's Health Author: Staff Editor Last Updated: Oct 17, 2017 - 11:19:39 AM



Risk of Caesarean Section Is Heritable

By Staff Editor
Oct 17, 2017 - 11:14:47 AM



Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Ezine
For Email Marketing you can trust


Email this article
 Printer friendly page

(HealthNewsDigest.com) - During the last decades, rates of Caesarean section have multiplied; by now it is one of the most frequently performed surgical treatments worldwide. Even if many of these C-sections are not strictly medically indicated, human childbirth is complicated and risky compared to that in other primates. Why has evolution by natural selection not led to a wider birth canal, thus reducing the high rates of obstructed labor?

Recently, a team headed by Philipp Mitteroecker, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Vienna, showed that these high rates are a direct consequence of the distinct characteristics of obstetric selection in humans. Using a mathematical model, the so-called "cliff edge model", they showed that natural selection cannot reduce the rates of obstructed labor. In fact, only weak selection for a large neonate, a narrow pelvic canal, or both is sufficient to account for the considerable incidence of fetopelvic disproportion (FPD, i.e., the fetus is too large to pass the maternal birth canal). Based on this model, they also predicted that the regular use of life-saving Caesarean sections throughout the last decades has already triggered an evolutionary increase of fetopelvic disproportion rates by 10 to 20 % (which equals roughly half a percentage point of the initial incidence).

In the recent study, Mitteroecker and colleagues use the cliff edge model to predict that women born by Caesarean because of FPD are 2.8 times more likely to develop FPD in their own childbirth compared with women born vaginally. This strong effect should be easier to detect in epidemiological data than the evolutionary increase predicted. "Indeed", says Mitteroecker, "we found empirical studies reporting risks for Caesarean up to twice as high for women born by Caesarean as compared to women born vaginally." This theoretical prediction of a complex epidemiological pattern lends support to the cliff edge model and its evolutionary implications.

Publication in "PNAS"
"Cliff-edge model predicts intergenerational predisposition to dystocia and Caesarean delivery"
Philipp Mitteroecker Sonja Windhager, and Mihaela Pavlicev
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1712203114

"Cliff edge model of obstetric selection in humans": Philipp Mitteroecker, Simon Huttegger, Barbara Fischer and Mihaela Pavlicev
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1612410113

###



Top of Page

HealthNewsDigest.com

Women's Health
Latest Headlines


+ For Women with Genetic Risk, Bi-Annual MRI Beats Mammograms
+ Placenta Consumption Offers Few Benefits for New Moms
+ For Older Women, Every Movement Matters
+ Substance Abuse in Pregnancy: Tips for Mothers-To-Be
+ Exposure to Chemical During Pregnancy May Cause Health Problems for Offspring
+ IIUDs May Have a Surprising Benefit: Protection Against Cervical Cancer
+ Understanding the Complexities of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening for Pregnant Women
+ Research Finds Hot Flashes, Night Sweats Connected to Obstructive Sleep Apnea Risk in Middle-Aged Women
+ Premature Labor: Tips for Mothers-To-Be
+ Breast Health Tips



Contact Us | Job Listings | Help | Site Map | About Us
Advertising Information | HND Press Release | Submit Information | Disclaimer

Site hosted by Sanchez Productions